|  
                
   
    | 
        
  
    | CRISES, WARS AND FRACTURES IN THE INTERNATIONAL 
      SYSTEM: Lessons from history on their recurrence and their impact on world trade
 |  
   
    | por Félix PeñaApril 2022
 |   
    |  |  
   
    |    | As we pointed out in our March newsletter, it is important 
        to bear in mind that in any country there are at least three perspectives 
        when defining an international trade insertion strategy. These are the 
        national perspective, the perspective of the country's geographical region 
        and the global perspective.
       We can identify several issues that could be part 
        of an agenda of common competitive advantages for the countries of the 
        South American region. These are: environmental protection and policies 
        related to the effects of climate change; the variety of natural resources, 
        particularly those related to the production of food and other smart goods; 
        the cultural convergence resulting from the miscegenation that characterizes 
        the region; and belonging to the South Atlantic, which is shared to a 
        large extent with the South African region. 
       Perhaps the time has come to develop more systematically 
        a network of international action-oriented think tanks in the South American 
        countries. Such a network, if it also had the support and active participation 
        of developmental financing agencies operating in the region, would help 
        harness the full potential that could result from LAIA conceived as a 
        useful instrument for international trade, integration and the development 
        of South American countries.
       The current crisis in Ukraine reinforces the need to analyze integration 
        processes, such as those currently underway in South America and Latin 
        America, especially in the context of Mercosur, with a broad approach 
        that includes all the factors that affect trade and economic development, 
        but which extend to the strengthening of the conditions for the prevalence 
        of peace and political stability in the region as a whole. 
 |  
   
    |  The war in Ukraine has unleashed tensions and uncertainties which could 
        even be intensifying at the time of writing this newsletter. Their future 
        implications are difficult to forecast, but they can be imagined as soon 
        as we take into account historical experiences such as those of the last 
        two world wars of the last century.  This is another sign of the times. Both the current tensions and the 
        events that generate them would indicate that we are entering a new cycle 
        in the international order that will affect world trade. It could even 
        mean entering an anarchic world, a world of crises, wars and fragmentation 
        with effects on global trade that are difficult to foresee. .
 This leads us to reflect on how to facilitate the design of an effective 
        international trade insertion strategy in our country and in the South 
        American region. As we pointed out in our previous Newsletter, it is necessary 
        to bear in mind that in any country there are at least three perspectives 
        when defining such a strategy. These are the national perspective, the 
        perspective of the geographical region to which a country belongs, and 
        the global perspective.
 The first is the national perspective itself. It is the one that enables 
        a country to integrate into world markets in consonance with what it understands 
        to be its interests, priorities and possibilities. This means having an 
        updated diagnosis of what it needs and can obtain from other markets, 
        in terms of goods, services, technologies and financing. It also implies 
        having an adequate organization, both at a business and governmental level, 
        to influence the effectiveness of the actions aimed at achieving the objectives 
        that are favored for the country's international insertion.  At the level of the diagnosis of a country's international context, the 
        quality of the action-oriented competitive intelligence of the areas of 
        analysis and research available in the country itself acquires great importance. 
        This also includes networks of connections with similar institutions in 
        other countries. The second perspective is the regional one. It refers to the degree of 
        practical knowledge available in a country with respect to the other countries 
        of the geographical region to which it belongs. It is a knowledge that 
        implies quality and precision in the diagnosis of a country's own geographical 
        region, including the many actors influencing foreign trade; their needs, 
        preferences and possibilities.  The third is the global perspective, that is, knowledge of the factors 
        and protagonists that affect the country's ability to compete in other 
        countries and regions of the global scenario. Today it is necessary to 
        have a strong connection and sound competitive intelligence about many 
        countries. And they outweigh what South American countries, especially 
        the smaller ones, can achieve on their own. This reinforces even more 
        the convenience of combining efforts, especially with other countries 
        in the region.  By way of example, we can mention some issues that could be part of an 
        agenda of common competitive advantages of the countries in the South 
        American region. These are: environmental protection and policies related 
        to the effects of climate change; the variety of natural resources, particularly 
        those linked to the production of food and other smart goods; cultural 
        convergence as a result of the miscegenation that characterizes the region; 
        and belonging to the South Atlantic, shared to a large extent with the 
        region of South Africa.  In light of the recent experience of the war in Ukraine, one of the clear 
        advantages of the South American countries is the fact that they have 
        not developed nuclear weapons. This advantage of the South American region, 
        which is also common to the whole of Latin America, has a very special 
        significance, both politically and economically. The experience resulting 
        from the relationship between Argentina and Brazil since the eighties 
        should be valued from such a perspective. In this regard, it is worth 
        remembering one of the meetings held in 1980, which may be considered 
        as one of the starting points of the agreements later reached by the governments 
        of Presidents Alfonsín and Sarney. (See the special issue on Brazil-Argentina 
        published by the Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (IBRI), 
        93-96, 1981). Perhaps the time has come for the South American region to develop a 
        network of international action-oriented think tanks that includes the 
        above-mentioned issues in its agenda. Its main objective would be to foster 
        the creation of possible joint work programs to be undertaken in the spheres 
        of government, business, culture, and R&D.  In recent years, South American countries, even jointly with other Latin 
        American countries, have made efforts to strengthen their capacity for 
        commercial action in the international arena. Their results, however, 
        have been inferior in terms of effectiveness and sustainability to those 
        obtained by other regions. A network such as the one suggested, which would also have the support 
        and active participation of the developmental financing agencies operating 
        in the South American region, would even make it possible to harness the 
        full potential that could result from LAIA, conceived as an instrument 
        for international trade, integration and development of the South American 
        countries. Also important would be the simultaneous joint effort together 
        with other countries in the Latin American and Caribbean region. In addition, 
        the RIAL (Latin American Council on International Relations) could also 
        play an effective role in this regard.  Moreover, it is also possible that, depending on how the current crisis 
        in Ukraine evolves, the positive view of regional integration processes 
        will increase, for both economic and political reasons. The impact on 
        the European Union, for example, could be severe. The Ukrainian government 
        has already expressed its interest in accelerating its incorporation into 
        the EU, precisely because of the experience gained in the aftermath of 
        World War II. Let us remember that the ideas that originated in 1950, 
        among others with Jean Monnet, Robert Schumann and Konrad Adenauer, were 
        based on the need to avoid the recurrence of the factors that had led 
        to the two World Wars of the last century.   The current crisis in Ukraine has, therefore, strengthened the need 
        to analyze integration processes such as those currently underway in South 
        America and Latin America, especially within Mercosur, with a broad approach 
        that certainly considers all the factors that affect trade and economic 
        development, but which transcend to the level of strengthening the conditions 
        for the predominance of peace and political stability in the region as 
        a whole. |  
   
    | 
         Ackerman, Elliot; Stavridis, Admiral James, "2034. A Novel of 
          the Next World War", Penguin Books, New York 2022.
Acharya, Amitav, "Europe just became the world's more dangerous 
          place", East Asia Forum, 21 March 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org.
Amstrong, Shiro, "The Economic consequences of Russia's invasion 
          of Ukraine", East Asia Forum, 20 March 2022, en https://www.eastaasiaforum.org. 
          
Amstrong Shiro; Wetsland, Tom, "The lessons of the economic war 
          on Russia", East Asia Forum, 20 March 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org.
Amstrong, Shiro, "Avoiding a Ukraine-induced ,global food crisis 
          will take global leadership", 13 March 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org. 
          
Bhatnagar, Stuti, "The Indian piece of the Russia-Ukraine puzzle", 
          East Asia Forum, 24 Marche 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org.
BID-INTAL, "Comercio e Integración en el Mundo post.COVID-19. 
          Oportunidades y desafíos para América Latina y el Caribe", 
          Prólogo de Ana Basco, Directora del BID-INTAL, Buenos Aires 2021. 
          
Cohen, Stephen F., "War With Russia? From Putin & Ukraine 
          to Trump & Russigate", Hot Books, New York 2019.
Fraser, Nicholas; Navarro, Marysa, "The Real Lives of Eva Perón", 
          Andre Deutsch, London 2003.
Granés, Carlos, "Delirio Americano. Una historia cultural 
          y política de América Latina", Taurus, Barcelona 
          2022.
Hass, Ryan, "Ukraine an opportunity to test China's strategic 
          outlook", East Asia Forum, 9 March 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org.
Hathaway, Oona A., "International Law Goes to War in Ukraine. 
          The Legal Pushback to Russia's Invasion", Foreign Affairs, March 
          15, 2022.
Herron, Francis, "Letters from the Argentine", G.P.Putnam's 
          Sons, New York 1943.
Mulder, Nicholas, "The Economic Weapon. The Rise of Sanctions 
          as a Tool of Modern War", Yale University Press, New Haven and 
          London 2022.
Mulder, Nicholas, "The Toll of Economic War. How Sanctions on 
          Russia Will Upend the Global Order", Foreign Affairs, March 22, 
          2022. 
Myers, Steven Lee, "El Nuevo zar. Ascenso y reinado de Vladimir 
          Putin", Península - Huellas, Barcelona 2018.
Norrlöf, Carla, "The New Economic Containment. Russian Sanctions 
          Signal Commitment to International Order", Foreign Affairs, March 
          18, 2022.
Pempel, T.J., "A Region of Regimes. Prosperity & Plunder 
          in the Asia-Pacific", Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 
          2021.
Peña, Félix. "Por qué es importante que 
          los países sudamericanos trabajen en red", diario La Nación, 
          suplemento comercio exterior, 10 de marzo 2022, página 3.
Petro Urrego, Gustavo, "Una Vida, Muchas Vidas", Planeta 
          Colombiana, Bogotá2021.
Posen, Adam S., "The End of Globalization? What Russia's War 
          in Ukraine Means for the World Economy?", Foreign Affairs, March 
          17, 2022.
Quinqquo, Jia, "China-US cooperation is the key to peace", 
          East Asia Forum 14 March 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org.
Sarotte, Mary Elise, "Dealing with the Devil. East Germany, Dëtente, 
          and Ostpolitik, 1969-1973", The University of North Carolina Press, 
          Chapel Hill and London 2001
Sarotte, Mary Elise, "1989. The Struggle to Create Post-Cold 
          War Europe", Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford 2009.
Stares, Paul B., "Preventive Engagement. How America can Avoid 
          War, Stay Strong, and Keep the Peace", A Council on Foreign Relations 
          Book, Columbia University Press, New York 2018.
Stares, Paul B., "Preparing for the Next Foreign Policy Crisis. 
          What the United States Should Do", Discussion Paper, Council on 
          Foreign Relations, Center for Preventive Action, New York 2019.
Stares, Paul B., Jia Quingguo, Tocci, Nathalie, Jaishankar, Dhruva, 
          Kortunov, Andrey, "Perspectives on a Changing World Order", 
          Discussion Paper Series on Managing Global Disorder n° 1,New York 
          2020.
Timmer, Peter, "Ukraine crisis feeds fears of another food crisis", 
          East Asia Forum, 13 March 2022, en https://www.eastasiaforum.org. 
Warleigh-Lack, Alex. "European Union - The Basics", Routledge- 
          Second Edition, London and New York 2009.
Yofre, Juan B., "La Trampa. Por qué y cómo el proceso 
          tomó la decisión de ocupar las Malvinas. Cronología 
          documentada de un fracaso", Sudamericana, Buenos Aires 2022.
 |  
  
    | 
        
 
   
    |  |   
    | Félix Peña es Director 
        del Instituto de Comercio Internacional de la Fundación ICBC; Director 
        de la Maestría en Relaciones Comerciales Internacionales de la 
        Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero (UNTREF); Miembro del Comité 
        Ejecutivo del Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales (CARI). 
        Miembro del Brains Trust del Evian Group. Ampliar 
        trayectoria. |  
 
 |  |  |